SAP’s top strategist

I found good illustration to my previous post of how important for top ERP vendors to communicate their strategy. Tom Foremski writes about his meeting with Jeff Nolan, “one of SAP’s key strategists, and a former venture capitalist at SAP Ventures”:

Mr Nolan has an interesting job. He runs the Apollo Group, it is a strategy and communications organization within SAP, that is sometimes referred to as the “Attack Oracle” group–because Oracle is SAP’s largest competitor in enterprise applications. And with Oracle’s acquisitions of PeopleSoft and Siebel, Oracle is getting serious about its so far lackluster applications business and is eyeing SAP’s huge 32,000+ customer base.

Mr Nolan’s goal is to make sure that SAP develops a strategy that enables it to compete against Oracle, whether it is through acquisitions, investments or just pure communications of SAP’s message–the goal is to rise above any noise that Oracle produces.

Mr Nolan has a key role to play within SAP, and it is one that he clearly recognizes because of his blogging activities. Mr Nolan writes one of the top VC blogs and because he is involved in the blogosphere he understands the importance of online influencers and how this process works. [That's the reason I get to have a face-to-face with him.]

Oracle CEO Larry Ellison commands a lot of attention and can easily insert Oracle’s point of view into many influential publications, consulting groups, and Wall Street brokerages. But Mr Nolan’s knowledge of how ideas and conversations propagate around the internet, gained from his experience as an A-list blogger, works to SAP’s advantage.

ERP software: Open Source or Traditional?

Now, after Oracle purchased PeopleSoft, it is SAP and Oracle who are the only players in the market segment of large corporations. These two vendors have top of the notch solutions with functionality both deep and wide. “What are the reasons companies decide to buy Oracle vs. SAP and vice versa?” I hear this question few times during last months.

Believe me or not, but functional nuances is the last thing to be considered today. The decision to buy ERP (ERP – Enterprise Resource Planning) software usually is very strategic. That is why it is product (and vendor) strategy that matters most. That means today clients tend to consider what vendor and its product will look like in 3-5 years, what is vendor’s development strategy, acquisition strategy, etc. And both SAP and Oracle pay much attention to communicate their strategy. (My opinion, that here Oracle looks better, more open and consistent, still…)

For big companies it is also important that vendor has proven and controlled financial stability (for vendors it usually means being public) and will exist (in any form) virtually forever, or at list for a very long time, and will not disappear one day. That is why big company will most likely to chose between Oracle and SAP, giving no chance to open source packages WebERP, SugarCRM, TinyERP, Compiere and others.

But what about mid- and low-market? Here chances of open source packages will be much higher. They still have to struggle with traditional players and have both pros and cons being compared against them. (Detail analysis is not subject of this post, but offer good topic for separate one.)

However a very special “opportunity segment” are companies with the same or similar philosophy like rapidly growing start-up companies. Open source model gives tremendous opportunity for such companies to save costs from the very beginning, contributing to financial success (of lower financial dependence) and giving opportunity to invest into development and operations.

We know such examples as SpikeSource. And I am sure there are others, so you are welcome to add more examples and to express your opinion in the Comments.

Epson RD-1s

Epson announced R-D1s, “a rangefinder camera that’s trying as hard as it can to look like an old-school film camera”. This is the coolest digital camera I ever saw!

RFID Virus

InfoSecDaily has a story from Freedom To Tinker telling about paper that describes “how RFID tags might be used to propagate computer viruses”:

Suppose that some subset of the world’s RFID readers had an input-processing bug of this general type, so that whenever one of these readers scanned an RFID tag containing diabolically constructed input, the reader would be hijacked and would execute some command contained in that input. If this were the case, an RFID-carried virus would be possible.

A virus attack might start with a single RFID tag carrying evil data. When a vulnerable reader scanned that tag, the reader’s bug would be triggered, causing the reader to execute a command specified by that tag. The command would reconfigure the reader to make it write copies of the evil data onto tags that it saw in the future. This would spread the evil data onto more tags. When any of those tags came in contact with a vulnerable reader, that reader would be infected, turning it into a factory for making more infected tags. The infection would spread from readers to new tags, and from tags to new readers. Before long many tags and readers would be infected.